In determining the success of any
society, ethical conduct is of utmost importance. In a universal thought, these
ethical conducts must be of good nature after all, human beings are most times
expectant that in their own different definitions, only the positive should
happen to them and the law of nature as is mostly believed connotes that if one
does a good deed, the same fate will come back to him or her. Thus, the onus is
on us all to have good character. However, it is ironic to note that while
hoping for the positive, some individuals would only portray actions that may
have a positive impact on themselves but negative impact on others. For keen
observers of the Nigerian society vis -a -vis leadership, it may seem quite
easy to come to conclusion that some of our politicians are corrupt.
As true as
this may sound, there are unanswered questions pertaining to followership. These
questions are even more important for those of us who hope to occupy political seats
one day. Apparently, I am referring to the youth. I am also a Nigerian youth in
the category of those who believe they are leaders but from my observations and
interaction with others, I have discovered that for many of these complainants
to become saints, they need to do a lot of repair work on themselves.
According to its dictionary
meaning, “Character” is all the qualities and features that make a person,
groups of people and places different from others”. In every aspect of our
life, family, religion or business, people see character as being very
important. Character is most times the very first factor that people get
related with when they are thought of. “Good” is an extensive concept that has
to do with what we get from life and has to deal with joy, happiness as well as
love while “bad” has to do with a deliberate effort of inflicting negativity on
people’s emotions. In view of this, a “good character” is one that the end result
affects not only the doer in a positive way but people that surround him or
her.
In every aspect of human
existence, there is the necessity for the creation of social structure. This
structure, when created should provide a direction towards how our lives can be
organised otherwise, a repulsive effect that may lead to misunderstanding would
occur thus our social institutions must be worked on to become even more
effective than what they are today. In our present day globalized world, the
individual gets acquainted to the globalized mechanism of communication coming from
the internet, television, Radio and magazines. This communication could come to
an individual for different end results such as in entertainment or business.
Here, the focus of the business owners is profit thus little care is given
towards the influence the content of programmes may have on the character of
the receiver or consumer. But there need to be laid down mechanisms to ensure
the survival of character because actions that used to be seen as vices now
seem as virtue and well accepted by the
society. Young people today take negative actions finding it difficult to blame
themselves but easy to put it all on their leaders when they do the same. One
can wonder what will become of them should they find themselves in leadership
positions later in life.
Humans are attracted to things
that have value thus the question should be asked, “Do humans still value good
character? The answer is “yes”, humans still value good character in the
globalization age and they understand that without it, not much can be achieved. When good character is talked about, people
most times refer to elements like honesty, truthfulness and obedience. The fore mentioned are part of the few that helps to
move the world forward whenever they are displayed for the good of the individual
and others. People are concerned about having good character because it would
help their reputation. The different thoughts of today’s youth have been the
result of the different orientations they have gotten from various spheres. One
would compare the ethical conduct of the 21st century youth and that
of the 20th century and may not be amazed by the huge difference and
where one’s preference will fall. No amazement because the effect of globalization
on character hasn’t taken this much toll at the time. Of course, globalization
has its own positive effects, my concern is how much on our ethical conduct and
how societies are dealing with the issue. In view of this, we must understand certain
notions in our bid to analyzing the possibility that character has to surviving
in our society in relation to globalization.
The laid down mechanisms earlier
pointed out would be looked at one after the other. The first is the “role of
the family” in the globalized age. Compared to what we used to have, the
essence of the family in the society is almost fading out thus the role of the
family in shaping individual’s character needs to be improved upon. The media
seem to be doing more of the family’s work and question of whether it is done
right or wrong is entirely a different issue. This could pose as challenging
because more than the family, media mechanisms are doing the job of teaching
people what is right or wrong however, these teachings are in the context of
what the media wants people to believe and this most times is not necessarily
the truth. Secondly, institutions also need to improve on their lot in
orientating young people on character and not as it is often seen on success.
They need to be made to understand that a preamble to being a success is good character.
0 comments:
Post a Comment